If your Fantasy Football TE
is Dallas Clark, Antonio Gates, Jermichael
Finley or Visanthe Shiancoe (or Tony Gonzalez
last week), then you are excused from this
article. Everyone else hates you, and you may
likely be suffering from “TE-Derangement
Syndrome”. One of the classic warning signs of
the onset terrible affliction is having started
Vernon Davis, Brent Celek, Jason Witten, or Owen
Daniels the first 3 weeks of The 2011 Fantasy Football season.
Of course I’m kidding, but
not really.
Some of this syndrome is
self-inflicted. Part of the statistical strategy
we have railed on and against is why Fantasy
Football GM’s put so much stock into QB’s and
could care less about their TE’s, and are pushed
by “group-think” to not take a TE early and/or
before anyone else takes one. Statistically, I
could argue, the TE is more important than the
QB in Fantasy Football. Not many people want to
buy that argument, not that they have a rational
reason why not...it's just "because". I
participated in preseason Mock Drafts and
occasionally I would take Antonio Gates in the 3rd
Round just to mix it up and people would become
“unglued” as if I just committed the crime of
the century.
Make a mistake at QB in the
preseason Fantasy Draft and there are a bunch of
viable alternatives to choose from off Week 1-2.
In leagues where I took Kevin Kolb, I now have
Michael Vick or Kyle Orton…doing fine thank you.
Make a mistake at TE, and have fun trying to
sift through whom to take now. Enjoy the “evil”
roller-coaster ride of picking up last weeks
“hot” TE, just in time for his 2 catch for 29
yard and no TD performance the week you have
him. TE is a very critical Fantasy Football
position, one that I believe is more/just as
important as selecting and maintaining a QB.
OK, however you and/or I
got here...we’re here with an underperforming
TE, and now what do we do?
The “best laid plans of
mice and men…”, can go awry. I have Gates and
Finley in about half the leagues I am associated
with. The other half, I have Vernon Davis and
Brent Celek. I have had to deal with a decision
on Davis and Celek…what do I do now?
One decision is easy. You
cannot give up or let go of Vernon Davis. Vernon
Davis is the best receiving TE in the NFL (sorry
to the great Gates, Finley, Clark). There is no
TE with physical metrics like Vernon Davis, and
obviously he has proven ability on the field.
Davis is stuck in a bad Offense, with a mediocre
QB, and is drawing all the coverage. All things
that were true last year. You will not find a
better TE than Vernon Davis on the TE scrap
heap. If anything you should try to trade for
him while his value is down.
The other decision I have
is hard, but I face to reality. Brent Celek is
“dead money”. I had Brent Celek as the projected
#1-2 scoring TE for Fantasy Football 2010 based
on a higher passing attempt Offense led by Kevin
Kolb. Celek’s performance was at its peak in
2009 when he was paired with Kolb, as they are
close friends. Take away Kolb, insert Vick and
now it’s a lower attempt passing game and with a
QB that doesn’t use the TE as much – and bingo,
Celek is mainly toast as a possible top-5 TE for
2010. Celek is not like Davis, where Davis is
the most physically gifted TE in the NFL and he
has to be used/will overcome. Celek is just
"good" and his projections are heavily dependent
upon a circumstance (just like if Dallas Clark
was on the Carolina Panthers right now, vs.
being paired with Peyton Manning). The game has
changed, Celek + Vick = Fantasy mediocrity for
Celek.
Many people that I am
hearing from are coming to the realization that
their TE situation is a mess, and aren’t sure
what to do now. “TE-Derangement syndrome” has
definitely struck them. Further symptoms of
“TE-Derangement Syndrome” include adding
Marcedes Lewis and Bo Scaife in the past few
weeks. I feel for those afflicted, as I have
been struck with this as well where I have Brent
Celek. So now what do we do?
First, I would make a run
at under-valued TE’s to see if I could get
lucky. I am trying to trade for Vernon Davis and
I am adding Owen Daniels if I see him cast
aside. The Owen Daniels move is a stretch, but
Daniels has been best-in-class just last year.
Daniels is slow coming off ACL and may never
produce elite again, but he did in 2009 and I’d
rather gamble on TE’s that have proven to be
recently Fantasy-great versus groping around
through Brandon Pettigrew and Todd Heap.
After that, it’s a sea of
“maybes” or “if they could just” TE’s. I put a
formula together to analyze this group of TE’s
based on weighing a couple criteria:
-
Current FF PPG
scoring YTD 2010
-
Targets per
game, full season (YTD 2010)
-
Target
“trend”, just the last 2 games average
-
Fantasy
scoring without TD’s included (to see who
was most dependent upon TD’s to push scoring
so far)
-
Next 5 Weeks
schedule/opponents in Pass-D difficulty
-
“Handcuff”
potential, as in another TE on roster to
take opportunity away and/or crowded by a
group of good/great WR’s (i.e., I like Aaron
Hernandez but, he has to fight
Moss/Welker/Gronkowski/Crumpler). I want
lower probabilities of having to fight for
“opportunity” on their own team
-
QB Pass
Attempts per game, more attempts = more
opportunity
I took the current scoring data + the target
trends + assigned value to the opponents + put
risk factor in if “handcuffed” + weighed pass
attempt levels and came up with a theoretical
“Most Likely to Score 10+ Fantasy (Traditional)
points”...for the next 5 Weeks.
The higher the percentage the more likely to
score 10+ per game, the lower the percentage the
less likely…and also the lower scoring potential
in general. This is not a crystal ball (although
I hope so), but is an attempt to weigh risk plus
current trending – before I blindly “reach into
the bag” and pull out a needed TE to replace
Brent Celek.
This is all 2010 Data through Week 3:
|
% chance at 10+ PPG Trad |
NAME |
TEAM |
PPR PPG |
Trad PPG |
|
YTD GP |
YTD TD |
2010 Targets |
Target per game |
|
Target last 2 games |
Targets per game last 2 |
|
PPR PPG minus TD |
Trad PPG minus TD |
Sched Next 5 Weeks |
BYE in next 5 weeks? |
Hand cuff ? |
QB Pass Att Per game YTD |
|
77.8% |
Miller, Zach |
OAK |
10.9 |
7.2 |
|
3 |
1 |
21 |
7.0 |
|
13 |
6.5 |
|
8.9 |
5.2 |
A |
NO |
NO |
36.0 |
|
75.6% |
Davis, Vernon |
SF |
12.1 |
6.4 |
|
3 |
0 |
25 |
8.3 |
|
13 |
6.5 |
|
12.1 |
6.4 |
B |
NO |
NO |
39.7 |
|
70.8% |
Carlson, John |
SEA |
11.2 |
6.8 |
|
3 |
1 |
24 |
8.0 |
|
19 |
9.5 |
|
9.2 |
4.8 |
A |
Wk 5 |
NO |
30.0 |
|
63.7% |
Boss, Kevin |
NYG |
9.3 |
6.6 |
|
1.5 |
0 |
8 |
5.3 |
|
7 |
7.0 |
|
9.3 |
6.6 |
A |
Wk 8 |
YES |
34.0 |
|
54.6% |
Moeaki, Tony |
KC |
12.1 |
8.1 |
|
3 |
3 |
19 |
6.3 |
|
15 |
7.5 |
|
6.1 |
2.1 |
A |
Wk 3 |
NO |
25.7 |
|
51.2% |
Keller, Dustin |
NYJ |
18.3 |
12.5 |
|
3 |
3 |
24 |
8.0 |
|
19 |
9.5 |
|
12.3 |
6.5 |
C |
Wk 7 |
YES |
26.3 |
|
48.4% |
Olsen, Greg |
CHI |
12.0 |
8.7 |
|
3 |
2 |
13 |
4.3 |
|
7 |
3.5 |
|
8.0 |
4.7 |
B |
Wk 8 |
NO |
30.3 |
|
45.2% |
Lewis, Marcedes |
JAC |
11.2 |
7.9 |
|
3 |
2 |
16 |
5.3 |
|
14 |
7.0 |
|
7.2 |
3.9 |
B |
NO |
YES |
30.7 |
|
41.2% |
Pettigrew, Brandon |
DET |
10.2 |
5.6 |
|
3 |
0 |
19 |
6.3 |
|
17 |
8.5 |
|
10.2 |
5.6 |
B |
Wk 7 |
YES |
40.7 |
|
38.1% |
Hernandez, Aaron |
NE |
11.4 |
7.0 |
|
3 |
0 |
15 |
5.0 |
|
13 |
6.5 |
|
11.4 |
7.0 |
D |
Wk 5 |
YES |
32.7 |
|
36.4% |
Gresham, Jermaine |
CIN |
9.6 |
5.3 |
|
3 |
1 |
21 |
7.0 |
|
11 |
5.5 |
|
7.6 |
3.3 |
B |
Wk 6 |
YES |
40.7 |
|
33.2% |
Scheffler, Tony |
DET |
10.5 |
5.6 |
|
3 |
1 |
20 |
6.7 |
|
13 |
6.5 |
|
8.5 |
3.6 |
B |
Wk 7 |
YES |
40.7 |
|
30.5% |
Daniels, Owen |
HOU |
4.0 |
2.0 |
|
3 |
0 |
13 |
4.3 |
|
11 |
5.5 |
|
4.0 |
2.0 |
A |
Wk 7 |
YES |
33.7 |
|
28.8% |
Celek, Brent |
PHI |
6.7 |
3.7 |
|
3 |
0 |
15 |
5.0 |
|
11 |
5.5 |
|
6.7 |
3.7 |
B |
Wk 8 |
NO |
32.7 |
|
23.2% |
Heap, Todd |
BAL |
9.8 |
5.1 |
|
3 |
1 |
22 |
7.3 |
|
11 |
5.5 |
|
7.8 |
3.1 |
C |
Wk 8 |
YES |
36.0 |
|
17.2% |
Scaife, Bo |
TEN |
7.4 |
4.7 |
|
3 |
1 |
8 |
2.7 |
|
5 |
2.5 |
|
5.4 |
2.7 |
A |
NO |
YES |
14.3 |
|
12.5% |
Winslow, Kellen |
TB |
8.4 |
4.6 |
|
3 |
0 |
16 |
5.3 |
|
10 |
5.0 |
|
8.4 |
4.6 |
D |
Wk 4 |
NO |
29.7 |
|
6.7% |
Miller, Heath |
PIT |
4.9 |
2.3 |
|
3 |
0 |
11 |
3.7 |
|
6 |
3.0 |
|
4.9 |
2.3 |
D |
Wk 5 |
NO |
20.0 |
·
Vernon Davis is obviously not on
waivers for pickup, I include him on here to
show his potential value vs. that of a Brent
Celek.
·
Zach Miller, John Carlson, and
Dustin Keller are likely already gone in most
12-team leagues, may be available in some
10-team leagues.
The 2 most likely available options in 12
team leagues are:
Kevin Boss (13% owned Yahoo) – Boss
missed a game and a half with a concussion. Boss
came back to 7 targets in Week 3. The Giants
seem likely to pass the ball a decent amount
this season. Boss and Eli have a decent passing
game relationship. The Giants have a bunch of
other weapons, but around end-zone it’s Boss and
Hakeem Nicks. Teams are likely wise to Nicks (4
TD’s in 3 games) around the end-zone now; Boss
makes a great 2nd end-zone option.
The schedule is favorable, and Boss is a great
blocker so he will be in the game on most every
down.
Tony Moeaki (8% owned Yahoo) -- a TD in
every game so far in 2010, he is likely to be
gone this week. The Chiefs do not have a ton of
options around the goal line, and Moeaki has
cashed in on that so far. Moeaki is on a Bye
week, but if you need a TE for the future he may
be the best on the board worth waiting a week
for. Hasn’t done a ton besides the TD’s, but not
a bad option…better than most.
The sleeper of the group is = Heath Miller
– projected numbers based on Week 1-3 are
squeezed with Roethlisberger out, but had good
stats with Roethlisberger. One to consider
getting in ahead on, with no Santonio Holmes
Miller is going to be a big end-zone target.
Miller is sometimes forgotten in 2010, but has
been a product of the low grade passing game of
the Steelers with Ben out.
I’m not as high on, and the numbers are
against:
Greg Olsen – TD’s are fluffing his
Fantasy PPG’s, he is being targeted very little
in the Bears system. He is a great TE, just
projected under-used in the Bears system.
Marcedes Lewis – 2 TD’s Week-1 puffed his
stats, his Week-1 was a total anomaly of his
typical performance. An average TE, on one of
the worst passing teams in the NFL.
Brandon Pettigrew and Tony Scheffler –
both very good TE’s, both on the same team to
cut into each others performance. Scheffler was
good Week 1, Pettigrew in Week 2, both in Week
3. Two different QB’s in 3 games, no pattern to
usage, it’s just a pure gamble on what would
happen here week-to-week.
Aaron Hernandez – good receiving TE
fighting for opportunity with Moss, Welker,
Edelman, Tate, Gronkowski, Crumpler, etc. A nice
player, but projects to be Fantasy erratic in
the Patriots system.
Jermaine Gresham – burst on to the scene
with 10 targets Week 1 and a TD, very little
since. I like the best of this "lower" group
but, I don't like counting on rookie TE's as my
main TE starter week-to-week.
Todd Heap – good TE, on a Ravens team
with a ton of other options including 2 good
rookie TE’s. Schedule does not do favors either.
A good game on opening night vs. Jets got people
excited, nothing much after that. The Jets game
was an anomaly.
Bo Scaife – mediocre TE on a team that
barely passes the ball. Every once in a while
will pop up with a TD, but no chance at
consistency with Vince Young. Very limited
option here.
I am thinking back to one actual Draft this year
where I did take Antonio Gates in the late 3rd
Round, and was skewered by a league participant
as he took Marques Colston and much later
grabbed Jermaine Gresham because "TE's are
crazy, they are all the same and there are
plenty available later....". He is now trying to
make a deal for my backup TE Zach Miller to
salvage his (0-3) season. "TE-Derangement
Syndrome" is a terrible thing when it hits.....
Select a position
from the tabs below
to see stats and scouting information for that respective
position.