*An on-going series of
putting college QBs in our mathematical
analysis. We don’t have all the needed data
until the 2011 NFL Combine results, but we can assume
some of it (for now) and we have all the game
performance/statistics.
See this link for details
on the College QB rating system -- Predicting
the Unpredictable…Projecting a College QB to the
NFL with a Mathematical Formula
Jake Locker,
Washington - NFL Draft 2011
For the life of me, I don't know what anyone sees in Jake Locker as an NFL QB....
I think it is the trap that many fall in --
the trap of the
"mobile" QB with a "big arm", a few "highlight"
clips of "cool" plays...and off we go,
excited about the physical. Physical is great,
but can he play QB? Can he play QB at the NFL
level and succeed? The passing red-flags jump out right away on Jake Locker,
whether you look at his horrendous (for a
supposed 1st Round draft pick QB) 2010 college
season...or his less-worse 2009 season.
A red-flag in our system is
in a QB's
final season -- any bad/low passing metrics in
their key
games/tougher opponents tally or an historical bad physical
metric (small height, high weight, arm/hand
size). Our bad metric/red-flags are a
statistical/data driven one -- if a college QB has
that bad mark, it matches with a database of QBs
we've studied who had the same "red-flag(s)" and
ultimately that QB didn't make it
to the NFL or played in the NFL but wasn't any good. Future elite
NFL QBs
mostly have zero red-flags in our college analysis,
at most they have one. Two red-flags knocks a QB out of
good/elite ratings and into a questionable
rating. 3 or more is pretty much doom.
7
QBs, of the 60+ we have studied in our algorithm
predicting college performance to pro success,
have as many "red-flags" as Jake Locker does
(3.5).
They would be:
Does anyone see any future
superstar QBs there?
There are 9 other QBs we
have studied who have more red-flags than Jake
Locker, of the 9 -- only David Garrard has
amounted to anything. Next would probably be
Derek Anderson and then a parade of
nowhere QBs (and Colt McCoy, too soon to
tell). A total of 16 QB with high red-flag
counts and David Garrard is their major success
story. This is not that kinda of crowd you
want to keep company with for comparisons for
becoming a future NFL QB.
Locker's red-flags are so
obvious, you have to chuckle at the discussion
of him being a first rounder. Keep in mind,
smart NFL
teams love for you or I, or Mel Kiper or
Todd
McShay to think they "love" a guy like
Jake
Locker. Weak organizations will lap this
"misinformation" up and possibly reach and waste
a pick on Locker...leaving the players the smart
teams really want, still on the board as someone
else just wasted their pick on Locker. It is
a smart business maneuver. It is probably what got
Denver to leap on Tim Tebow in 2010, due to the
buzz from Patriots camp on how they "loved"
Tebow. Locker is that name in play now to dupe
weaker organizations...like Jimmy Clausen and
Tim Tebow were last year, used as "hype"
pawns. Locker is
a dud and most smart NFL execs (I think) know it
-- they are just hoping a dumb organization will
bite on it. Clausen was a top-5 projected pick
at this stage (2 months pre-draft) in 2010, only to become a late 2nd Round pick for
Carolina...one that John Fox
didn't want.
Why is Jake Locker so bad
looking ahead to the NFL? Let's look at some of
the major red-flags he has accumulated...
Perpetually less than 60% Completion Percentage
Locker has had amazing
inaccuracy passing, and he has his whole career.
Looking at just 2010, the highlights of his
inaccuracies are as follows:
-
Locker played 12 games
total in
2010, with only 6 games over 60% Completion
Percentage (60%+ a key metric for a future
elite QB)...and 2 of
those 6 games he did hit 60%+, he was exactly
at 60.0%. Locker was "accurate" in just 50% of
his games last season, historically future
elite QBs will exceed that 60%
level in 75-80%+ of their games played.
-
We have focused our
study of Locker to 8 key game/stronger-winning
record
opponents -- in those 8 games, Locker had
60%+ Comp Pct in just 3 of those 8 games. By contrast
Tom Brady had
6 of 7 key games over 60%, Sam Bradford 7 of
9 key games, and Ben Roethlisberger 8 of 8
key games all over 60.0% completion
percentage per game. Locker did it in just 3
of 8 games this past season.
-
Locker's "amazing"
(facetiously said...) 2009
season -- where he "should have come out
to be a
# 1 draft pick" according to most...12 games played and
only 4
games over 60.0%...and 1 of them right at
60.0%.
-
58.2% Completion
Percentage overall in 2009, 55.4% in 2010
Locker is nowhere near an
accurate enough passer in college to translate
to the pros. When we analyze just the 8
key games Locker had in 2010, he averaged just 53.7%
Completion Percentage. The 3 worst QBs in this
metric that we have studied so far that played
their final year in college within the last 5
seasons:
-
51.3% = Jevan Snead,
Ole Miss
-
53.7% = Jake Locker,
Washington
-
54.5% = Zac Robinson,
Oklahoma State
The story gets worse when
you give "weight" to those key games for strength
of opponent, our worst Completion Percentage QBs
on that metric of those having played in the
past 5 years:
-
45.7% = Jevan Snead,
Ole Miss
-
50.4% = Jake Locker,
Washington
-
51.8% = Zac Robinson,
Oklahoma State
Not only has Locker been an
inaccurate passer, he has not shown any TD
Passing prowess either.
TDs
per Pass Attempt issues
I love to look at Passing
TDs per Pass Attempt, as this metric really
shined as something that separates the future
elites from the future bust QBs. Jake Locker has
made the unenviable list here as well.
In key games we looked at,
10 QBs have averaged a TD pass per 25 or more
passing attempts. All the future elite QBs we
studied had between a TD per every 15-19
attempts in key games, some other QBs had as low (good) as a TD
thrown for every 10-12 throws made.
In our study, 25 or
more Pass Attempts per TD (in key games) was a near "death blow" of sorts for projecting
a QB to the NFL. Of the 10 QBs that we have
studied that have hit the bad mark
of 25+, only David Garrard went on to be a viable NFL
QB, but even he has not shown a tremendous TD
passing prowess in the NFL either. The rest of the group
are all washouts -- including notables Matt
Leinart and Rex Grossman as ones with
the most NFL time of the "sad" group at 25+ Pass
Attempts per TD in key games. *Michael
Vick had metrics in this 25+ range as well, but
had multiple injury issues his final year.
Physical issues
On top of all of his
passing issues, Locker is reportedly measured at
6'2.25"...just above the 6'2 cutline for where
QBs seem to have issues more times than not. 32"
arm length has not been a great trend either.
Locker is
not near an elite height or length for a QB. Besides
the ability to run, I've seen nothing from a
physical standpoint...or passing ability to get
anyone excited about Jake Locker as an NFL QB.
NFL QB
that Jake Locker most compares to statistically...
There are 2 QBs that Locker
compares to in our projections system, with 1 of
them being not so bad (I guess...). Rex Grossman and
David
Garrard are both smaller height QBs who had low
Completion Percentages with weak TDs per Pass
Attempt in college, as well as not so great INTs per Pass
Attempt metrics either. David Garrard probably
fits the mold of Locker a little better, as Garrard is
"thick" like Locker and has running ability like
Locker.
Garrard took 4 seasons in
the NFL to
mature, before he started in his 5th season.
Garrard has been a starter for the past 5
seasons with a (24-35) overall record during
that time. Garrard had decent seasons in 2007
and 2010, but nothing draw dropping. At best
Locker maybe over time could pull off being a
useful NFL QB maybe, but more odds are on Locker being a
complete bust.
-
"Adj" means just key
games/better competition -- weighted for
strength of opponent
-
"per 35 att" numbers
are the key games, weighted for strength of
opponent and then translated into an average
as if every QB had an equal 35 Pass Attempts
per game all the time, and thus what would
each QB produce if they had 35 passes per
game based on the key games their final
college season.
|
QB |
Yr |
College |
H |
W |
adj Comp Pct |
adj Yds per Comp |
adj Pass per TD |
adj Pass Per INT |
|
Yds per game 35 att |
TDs per game 35 att |
INTs per game 35 att |
|
Locker, Jake |
2010 |
Washington |
74.25 |
228 |
50.4% |
11.7 |
30.4 |
28.8 |
|
206.3 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
|
Grossman, Rex |
2002 |
Florida |
73.25 |
217 |
57.4% |
11.3 |
28.3 |
27.3 |
|
226.4 |
1.2 |
1.3 |
|
Garrard, David |
2001 |
East Carolina |
73 |
230 |
54.9% |
12.7 |
24.6 |
24.6 |
|
243.5 |
1.4 |
1.4 |
Jake Locker Overall Score =
0.262*
* see historical rating chart on link to original
study = Predicting
the Unpredictable…Projecting a College QB to the
NFL with a Mathematical Formula)
There are so many red-flags
on Locker it still is amazing he is being
discussed in the first round. I still believe
that the Locker-hype is a front by smart teams
to push him on a sucker team (Oakland Raiders
are you listening?). My prediction is most NFL
execs and Draft gurus will wise up to this and
Locker will fall in the projections to a 2nd-3rd
Round pick and then actually be a 3rd Round
selection. Maybe a "project" QB long-term at
best, but he is definitely not stepping in right
away to save a franchise. If selected in the 1st
Round, Locker is the ultimate "fools gold" QB in
this year's NFL Draft (are you listening
Cincinnati Bengals?).
Select a position
from the tabs below
to see stats and scouting information for that respective
position.