*An on-going series of
putting college QBs in our mathematical
analysis. We don’t have all the needed data
until the 2011 NFL Combine results, but we can assume
some of it and we have all the game
performance/statistics.
See this link for details
on the College QB rating system
--
Predicting the Unpredictable…Projecting a
College QB to the NFL with a Mathematical
Formula
Andy Dalton is a "sleeper"
among a few people that I consider "wise" on the
NFL Draft process. This made me very intrigued
to do the analysis on Dalton to see how he
popped up on our mathematical formula. The
numbers are coming up that Dalton is a
potentially very good NFL QB, with some signs of a
chance to be an elite NFL QB.
One mild negative on Dalton
is that he stands exactly 6'2 according to
reports at the Senior Bowl and the NFL Combine.
A height of 6'3+ has a better statistical track
record, but 6'2 and above is a statistically OK (not great) cut for
the future NFL QB's (Aaron Rodgers is 6'2 as well)
and this is not a total red-flag...but it's close.
Below
6'2 and the numbers really turn against a
college QB's future success in the NFL (6'0
Drew Brees being the major exception to the
rule).
The 3 best (by performance)
QB's at the Pro-level, that are under 6'3 and
have been drafted in the past 5 years (according
to me):
-
Mark Sanchez, NY Jets
-
Matt Stafford, Detroit
-
Chad Henne, Miami
After those 3 QBs, there are 19
other QBs we have analyzed (and we tried to
analyze relevant QB's/higher picked QB's first,
70+ researched so far) that were under 6'3 --
and that list is mostly a
collection of complete washouts or non-performers. It
also includes, "too soon to tell" Tim Tebow and Colt
McCoy...both of whom our mathematical formula
projects will "bust" with strong probability,
definitely not future elite NFL QBs. Under 6'3
is not a "death-sentence", there are just
stronger odds against becoming a future NFL
elite based on the recent history/trending.
My biggest negative on
Dalton could be that the WAC/Mountain West QBs
historically have been the thorn in my side on
this mathematical formula for rating College QBs
for NFL potential. Alex Smith (Utah) was truly
amazing in his final season (statistically) and
John Beck (BYU) was pretty good as well. They
both rated well in our projections system,
but both have looked terrible (to me) in the NFL.
Certainly, neither Smith nor Beck have excited
anyone in the NFL with their NFL career
performances so far. Along comes another
Mountain West QB draft prospect Andy Dalton, who
is also projecting with very
similar/nice numbers as well. Perhaps playing in the WAC/Mtn West
is worthy of a special red-flag deduction/ratings penalty
in our system.
With or without a red-flag
for conference played in, Dalton's passing
metrics are
much more impressive than current hot 2011 QB
prospect Blaine Gabbert. Dalton has won
more games than Gabbert, Dalton has been more
accurate overall than Gabbert, and he has a much
higher/elite level Pass Attempts per TD metric over
Gabbert in our rating system (looking at either
just their key games or all games).
Dalton has thrown for 50
TDs over the past 2 seasons as a starter and
Gabbert has thrown 40. You might comment, "that's
not much of a difference!" Consider that
Gabbert comes from a shotgun/spread, heavy throw
system (920 Pass Attempts last 2 seasons) and
Dalton from a little more balanced system (639
Pass Attempts in the past 2 seasons). Look at
overall (all games) Pass Attempts per TD in
their last 2 seasons and you will see that just
looking at raw totals between the two are
misleading:
-
12.8 Pass Att per Pass
TD = Dalton (2009 + 2010)
-
23.0 = Gabbert (2009 +
2010)
-
18.5 = Dalton (2008
+ 2009 -- matching him up with Gabbert as a
Sophomore and Junior year comparison)
One might think that is not
a lot, but in our historical look at that --
Gabbert's 23.0 Pass Attempts per TD is way off
where the future elites are. Looking at their
last 2 seasons of Pass Attempts per Passing TD
metric results (above) -- and expanding it to a
hypothetical 12 game season with exactly 35 Pass
Attempts each game, the difference would be 33
Passing TDs for Dalton and just 18 for Gabbert
(in the hypothetical season).
In Dalton's 3 "toughest"
games in 2010 -- at Utah, vs. SD State, and a Bowl
game matchup with then #3-4 rated Wisconsin. In those
3 games alone, Dalton had:
-
8 TDs to 1 INT (Gabbert
3 TDs and 3 INTs in his 3 toughest 2010
games)
-
A TD pass for every 9.4
passes thrown, which is way above elite
level (Gabbert a TD pass for every 47 passes
in his 3 toughest matchups, which is awful
beyond words looking at the history of this
metric in our system)
-
14.3 passing yards per
completion, another elite number (Gabbert
just 10.6 per in his 3 toughest)
-
An amazing 76.0%
completion percentage (Gabbert 63.1% in his
3 toughest)
Looking at all of our
historical data on college QBs so far with their
stats weighted for strength of schedule, Dalton
is above average rated among all QBs we have
looked at so far in completion percentage, yards
per completion, and Pass Attempts per TD ratio.
Dalton has no red-flags in our system with
Passing metrics.
Dalton's numbers are sitting right there with the future elite
QB's that we have studied; based on his metrics as a passer. However, the physical "measureables"
hurt Dalton at 6'2 height and 31.5 inch arm length
-- he's right on the physical cusp of where QBs
statistically/historically struggle translating
to the NFL.
Dalton's Passing Metric
rankings (among 13 of the notable 2011 QBs we
have looked at):
-
2nd Best = Pass
Attempts per TD pass, in key/tougher
opponent games (Newton #1)
-
4th Best = Completion
Percentage, in key/tougher opponent games
-
4th Best = Passing
yards per completion
-
5th Best = TD/INT ratio
in key/tougher opponent games
Andy Dalton
Overall Score = 0.889
*See original work and
scoring tables from the following link
--
Predicting the Unpredictable…Projecting a
College QB to the NFL with a Mathematical
Formula
*This is assuming that
Dalton scores well on the Wonderlic, he could
tumble to a more mediocre rating if not.
I filtered the list of QBs
that we have put through this mathematical
system so far to try to match up Andy Dalton to
current NFL QB's with similar college stats in
key games. I looked at a similar level of
Completion Percentage, Yards per Completion,
Pass Attempts per TD and per INT...plus only
looked at 6'3 and shorter QBs. By doing this my
original list was filtered down to one "good QB"
comparison -- Mark Sanchez; and one that may not
be so good -- John Beck.
A clip/glimpse at just a
few of our system's comparison data on these 3
QBs:
-
"Adj" means just key
games/better competition -- weighted for
strength of opponent (our own proprietary
work, weighted for strength of opponent)
-
"per 35 att" numbers
are the key games, weighted for strength of
opponent and then translated into an average
as if every QB had an equal 35 Pass Attempts
per game all the time, and thus what would
each QB produce (in college) if they had 35 passes per
game based on the key games their final
college season. In an attempt to somewhat
equalize the college performance and show
you what our systems sees.
|
QB |
Yr |
College |
H |
W |
adj Comp Pct |
Adj Yds per Comp |
adj Pass per TD |
adj Pass Per INT |
|
Yds per game 35 Att |
TDs per game 35 Att |
INTs per game 35 Att |
|
Dalton, Andy |
2010 |
TCU |
74.0 |
215 |
65.3% |
13.6 |
13.4 |
42.9 |
|
311.1 |
2.6 |
0.8 |
|
Beck, John |
2006 |
BYU |
74.1 |
215 |
63.8% |
12.9 |
16.1 |
72.6 |
|
287.3 |
2.2 |
0.5 |
|
Sanchez, Mark |
2008 |
USC |
74.3 |
227 |
64.7% |
11.3 |
11.4 |
38.3 |
|
256.7 |
3.1 |
0.9 |
*The Wonderlic score is assumed
"good" at this point, but a bad
Wonderlic score and Dalton
will drop out of our potentially good/great
ratings and move toward mediocre/good ratings
with possible "bust" potential.
Dalton is going to be one
to keep an eye on for moving up the NFL Draft
boards. I would not be shocked to see Dalton
slide into the early 2nd round
of the NFL Draft. Dalton is intriguing, as he
may be one of the most efficient passers of all the 2011
QBs. I would be more excited on Dalton if he was
an inch or two taller. Again, not saying he is
doomed at 6'2, but it is not historically a
great place to be for an NFL QB. The "size
thing" will likely hold him out of becoming a
potential 1st Round pick. That's where I think a
Ricky Stanzi has the "sleeper QB" edge on Dalton
-- both long time starters, very good numbers,
lots of wins, character seems to be fine...but
Stanzi is 2.1 inches taller at 6'4+. All other
things being equal, if an NFL GM is faced with
the choice of Stanzi or Dalton only, I think you
would have to lean toward choosing Stanzi due to
the physical consideration. An NFL team landing Dalton in the 2nd or 3rd
Round may have an absolute steal on their hands.
Select a position
from the tabs below
to see stats and scouting information for that respective
position.